Employee Performance Assessment in the Field of Public Infrastructure and Facilities Handling Using the C4.5 Decision Tree Algorithm
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
One way that should be finished to decide representative execution is to decide the worth that has been gotten equitably founded on the discipline measures of participation, obligation regarding finishing work, and consistence with commitments and denials, utilizing the C4.5 choice tree calculation. The data studied was the Worker Performance Evaluation Form with a total of 108 workers, in 2023-2024 based on certain criteria with the data selected being 96 active workers. This data has several criteria, namely attendance discipline, responsibility for completing work, and compliance with obligations and prohibitions. The main aim of this writing is to determine employee performance from each criterion. The C4.5 decision tree algorithm can assist in the decision-making process regarding improving the performance and training of workers in the field of handling public infrastructure and facilities. You can see the results of the research that has been carried out as training data, the gain and entrophy values have been calculated. In the first partition, the highest gain value was obtained for Compliance with Obligations and Prohibitions with a value of 0.489943 and the smallest was Responsibility for Completion of Work with a value of 0.172824. This algorithm can be used to determine employee performance as a candidate for employee performance which will be determined by the relevant agency.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The writer agreed that the article copyright by Smatika journal and the writer has the right to disseminate the paper published without permission in advance.
[2] K. A. Mutiarasari, “PPSU Kepanjangan dari Apa? Penjelasan dan Tugas Pekerja PPSU .” Accessed: Feb. 27, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6228605/ppsu-kepanjangan-dari-apa-penjelasan-dan-tugas-pekerja-ppsu
[3] M. Barbieri, L. Micacchi, F. Vidè, and G. Valotti, “The Performance of Performance Appraisal Systems: A Theoretical Framework for Public Organizations,” Rev Public Pers Adm, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 104–129, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1177/0734371X211043560.
[4] C. J. ARIMIE and A. I. OROBOSA, “EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND CAREER ADVANCEMENT IN NIGERIAN PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS: AN EXPLICATORY REVIEW,” NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, 2023.
[5] G. Thabroni, “Pengertian Kinerja Karyawan.” Accessed: Feb. 27, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://serupa.id/kinerja-karyawan-pengertian-penilaian-evaluasi-indikator-faktor-dsb/#google_vignette
[6] C. L. Andesti, F. Lonanda, N. Azizah, A. Info, D. Mining, and E. Language, “Potential for Improvement of Student ’ s English Language with,” vol. 5, no. 1, 2022.
[7] K. F. Irnanda and A. P. Windarto, “Penerapan Klasifikasi C4.5 Dalam Meningkatkan Kecakapan Berbahasa Inggris dalam Masyarakat,” in Seminar Nasional Teknologi Komputer & Sains (SAINTEKS), 2020, pp. 304–308.
[8] Z. Azam, Md. M. Islam, and M. N. Huda, “Comparative Analysis of Intrusion Detection Systems and Machine Learning-Based Model Analysis Through Decision Tree,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 80348–80391, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3296444.
[9] S. V. Natasya, R. M. Awangga, and M. Y. H. Etyawan, “Penerapan Decision Tree (ID3) Untuk Profiling Mahasiswa dan Alumni,” Smatika Jurnal, vol. 13, no. 02, pp. 250–259, 2023, doi: 10.32664/smatika.v13i02.898.
[10] A. Schidler and S. Szeider, “SAT-based Decision Tree Learning for Large Data Sets,” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 3904–3912, May 2021, doi: 10.1609/aaai.v35i5.16509.
[11] Adnan Darwiche and Auguste Hirth, On the Reasons Behind Decisions, vol. 352. 2020.
[12] M. Bansal, A. Goyal, and A. Choudhary, “A comparative analysis of K-Nearest Neighbor, Genetic, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, and Long Short Term Memory algorithms in machine learning,” Decision Analytics Journal, vol. 3, p. 100071, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.dajour.2022.100071.
[13] R. Balontong and J. Pomperada, “C4.5 Decision Tree Algorithm and Linear Regression in Guidance and Counseling Decision Support System,” Journal of Innovative Technology Convergence, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 115–128, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.69478/JITC2024v6n2a12.
[14] M. Ahmad, N. A. Al-Shayea, X.-W. Tang, A. Jamal, H. M. Al-Ahmadi, and F. Ahmad, “Predicting the Pillar Stability of Underground Mines with Random Trees and C4.5 Decision Trees,” Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 18, p. 6486, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.3390/app10186486.
[15] J. Zhou et al., “Decision tree models for the estimation of geo-polymer concrete compressive strength,” Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1413–1444, 2023, doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024061.
[16] S. V. Natasya, R. M. Awangga, and M. Y. H. Etyawan, “Penerapan Decision Tree (ID3) Untuk Profiling Mahasiswa dan Alumni,” SMATIKA JURNAL, vol. 13, no. 02, pp. 250–259, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.32664/smatika.v13i02.898.